Is OSNA better than imprint cytology for intraoperative diagnosis of cancer involvement of axillary sentinel node in breast cancer?


Por: Luna-Tomas, MA, Sola-Suarez, M, Mariscal-Martinez, A, Castella-Fernandez, E, Martinez-Roman, S, Pascual-Miguel, I, Quiroga-Garcia, V and Julian-Ibanez, JF

Publicada: 1 abr 2018
Resumen:
Objective: The study aim was to establish Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and Accuracy Values of both imprint cytology (IC) and the OSNA assay for intraoperative assessment of axillary sentinel node (SN) cancer involvement in breast cancer. Specifically, we wished to find out if true positive and false negative results of IC were associated to axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND). Also, we addressed a comparative cost analysis between techniques. Methods: 244 patients treated for breast cancer in the Breast Unit of Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol from 2011 to 2015 were prospectively included. A transversal, consecutive design was applied to assess IC compared to the reference test (OSNA). Inclusion criteria were: T1 and T2 tumors with negative nodes, both clinically and on ultrasound. Results: Sensitivity of IC for macrometastases was 70%. The NPV of IC for macrometastases was 95,75%. Accuracy of IC was 96,12%. In the comparative cost analysis, the release time of results for OSNA doubled that of IC and was associated with an increased cost of (sic) 370. Conclusions: IC has been stated as a good technique for intraoperative cancer involvement SN with high sensitivity and NPV compared to the OSNA assay. It allows keeping the whole node tissue and thus the possibility of improved histopathological evaluation, which can be useful for adjuvant, and offers the advantage of being less time consuming. Cost analysis shows a higher cost for OSNA, which may exceed the benefit of sorting out false negatives from IC. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Filiaciones:
Luna-Tomas, MA:
 HUGTIP, BDU, Ctra Canyet S-N, Barcelona 08916, Spain

 HUGTIP, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Barcelona, Spain

:
 HUGTIP, BDU, Ctra Canyet S-N, Barcelona 08916, Spain

 HUGTIP, Dept Nucl Med, Barcelona, Spain

:
 HUGTIP, BDU, Ctra Canyet S-N, Barcelona 08916, Spain

 HUGTIP, Dept Radiol, Barcelona, Spain

Castella-Fernandez, E:
 HUGTIP, BDU, Ctra Canyet S-N, Barcelona 08916, Spain

 HUGTIP, Dept Pathol, Barcelona, Spain

Martinez-Roman, S:
 HUGTIP, BDU, Ctra Canyet S-N, Barcelona 08916, Spain

 HUGTIP, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Barcelona, Spain

:
 HUGTIP, BDU, Ctra Canyet S-N, Barcelona 08916, Spain

 HUGTIP, Dept Gen Surg, Barcelona, Spain

:
 HUGTIP, BDU, Ctra Canyet S-N, Barcelona 08916, Spain

 HUGTIP, Dept Med Oncol ICO, Barcelona, Spain

:
 HUGTIP, BDU, Ctra Canyet S-N, Barcelona 08916, Spain

 HUGTIP, Dept Gen Surg, Barcelona, Spain
ISSN: 09609776





Breast
Editorial
Churchill Livingstone, JOURNAL PRODUCTION DEPT, ROBERT STEVENSON HOUSE, 1-3 BAXTERS PLACE, LEITH WALK, EDINBURGH EH1 3AF, MIDLOTHIAN, SCOTLAND, Estados Unidos America
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 38 Número:
Páginas: 181-187
WOS Id: 000427477800030
ID de PubMed: 29455041

MÉTRICAS